A subset of the data seems to be readily available, if someone (with high or low T?) wants to swoop in and make us all a bit wiser:
Comment on Testosterone vs. IQ
smegforbrains@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I can’t find a study that produced that result. Also a reverse image search only finds hits on meme sites and social media. Pressing X für doubt.
Ymer@feddit.dk 5 weeks ago
Min7_f43sh_j5@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
It may be a figure that someone produced independently from the publicly available data sets: addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 1 month ago
My bet is that it’s paywalled like a lot of academic studies. It’s likely out there, but best of luck to you nailing it down, I’ve been having a Hell of a time turning up worthwhile results with search engines for quite a while.
y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Isn’t the title of the study on the graph?
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes, you might be surprised at how few meaningful results can be gleaned even when using exact titles in search queries. I’m not even talking about the ad results that appear at the top of the page now, even Google sometimes entirely fails to provide the desired results.
y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
Haha I believe it. The internet was supposed to make sharing information easier. Womp