Comment on Should a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?
remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 weeks agoSorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph.
Good try though. ;)
over_clox@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Hah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍
As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.)
And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.