Comment

I would say we can’t in most cases know exactly or even approximately what is the objectively morally better decision. But that doesn’t make it less objective. It just makes it hard or perhaps even impossible to know.

source

Sort:hotnew top

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
How can you know it’s objective if it’s impossible to know what is morally better?

source
- ParsnipWitch@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Because for something to be considered objective the only necessary condition is that how something is lies entirely with the object itself and not with the person(s) looking at it. Whether or not we can measure it in actuality doesn’t matter for that definition.
  
  Consider you could wire every existing person up to some kind of device that measures their physical and psychological pain and gives out a number, it doesn’t matter who looks at it, it would obviously always be the same number.
  
  source
  - FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    You think everyone has the same levels of physical and psychological pain tolerance? Nonsense. I have trigeminal neuralgia. I’m would bet my pain tolerance is objectively a hell of a lot higher than yours at this point.
    
    source
    ParsnipWitch@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Why does that matter? Than for you the device would simply give out a smaller number.
    
    source