Because the NYT is an extremely overrated pro-establishment shit show? 🤷
Comment on They quit their jobs. Their ex-employers sued them for training costs
falsem@kbin.social 8 months agoI don't know why OP posted that shit website instead of the actual source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/27/business/training-repayment-agreement-debt.html
VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 8 months ago
unfreeradical@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Considering its function is to protect the establishment, I question the characterization of its being overrated.
VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 8 months ago
That’s mostly true, but some people who aren’t generally that pro-establishment themselves still see it as inherently trustworthy and politically left of center even though it’s neither. I blame MSM being an invariably pro-establishment circlejerk.
unfreeradical@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Right. I am only adding that its efficacy would diminish if it represented itself as pro-establishment.
Those who understand its function as pro-establishment, and those who are not concerned, are the two groups that are least relevant.
It is third, which you mentioned, who are most relevant, the ones who may be most easily influenced toward an effect that substantial overall
falsem@kbin.social 8 months ago
And posting their content on another website improves that?
VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 8 months ago
It deprives them of the traffic and thus ad revenue that reading it directly on their site would give them, yes
unfreeradical@lemmy.world 8 months ago
May they will file a complaint against us for loss a revenue.
mrbubblesort@kbin.social 8 months ago
my guess is it'd be that paywall on that link you posted