You would have two ways to watch a show.
- Get the streaming app and sub to it and watch it on there.
- Buy it on the steam store, and Apple/HBO/whoever takes a cut.
Comment on Opinion: It's time for a proper Steam-type service for TV alongside streaming exists.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 week agoWhy would they do that if they can all have their own platforms instead?
You would have two ways to watch a show.
You’re talking from the viewer’s perspective. Why should the company share their profits?
Well, okay, they could sell it like that on their own platform then. But they don’t.
Rights issues are complicated and not solved by creating another platform, unfortunately.
memfree@beehaw.org 1 week ago
From Steam founder Gabe Newell, 2011:
The same can be said of movies/tv – except Steam saw the issue before EA and everyone made their own streaming stores, whereas all the video distributors have splintered into their own services.
I’m not sure where/why Hulu failed to gain the sort of share Steam attained. It existed early on and had … at least 3 big networks (iirc, not cbs? but abc, nbc and fox – then nbc dropped out to just do peacock, I think). Perhaps hulu didn’t pay enough for rights or perhaps Apple, Netflix and Amazon represented too many other players to make the equivalent arguments as Steam made.
Skavau@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Yeah, I mean ultimately muh rights issues aren’t the consumers problem. If the networks and streamers don’t make a TV series accessible on day 1, the internet will.