Comment

Comment on Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of March 16th

Mafia 3. I’m probably half way through and starting to get burnt out by the grind and the buggy nature of the game. It is infected by Ubisoft formula, but it’s much more notorious and less fluid. Glad they are going a different route for Mafia 4

source

Sort:hotnew top

jamie_oliver@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
Sas to hear, Mafia 2 was at the time it released my favorite “gta” type game and one of my favorite cinematic experiences in gaming. It absolutely had a less is more attitude rather than ubisoft bloat… There wasn’t that much to do, and it was ery linear which was a strength that made the characters and story feel well presented at all times for me. Haven’t played it in ten years tho so might be a bit of nostalgia mixed in…

What type of ubisoft mechanics have they jammed into it, out of curiousity?

source
- lustyargonian@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  Mafia 1 DE and 2 both were largely linear and didn’t waste your time with fluff. I really enjoyed those two. Mafia 3 on the other hand had good story drip fed to you after hours of grind.
  
  Ubisoft like mechanics:
  
  Each area has wiretaps that help a lot, but are very much like liberating radio towers, less grand.
  
  Once you open up a district, you’ve to do a checklist of repetitive missions, x2, and then go back to one of the areas from the already done missions to kill the underboss. Rinse and repeat 9 times. So that becomes more like (6 missions + 1) x 2 x 9. Some missions are optional. But it’s quite a lot. There’s some variety and some interesting story beats, but when it’s given in such grindy manner you have to have a lot of patience to enjoy it.
  
  A lot of the missions are set up like far cry outposts or assassinate a target style. In fact you are incentivised to play stealth, to the point you start feeling like an assassin or hitman.
  
  source
  - jamie_oliver@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    Sounds tedious… I would probably get burnt out as well :p
    
    source