Comment

Comment on Why is Jury Nullification a Thing, But You Can’t Talk About It in Court?

Jury nullification can be used for evil.
From Wikipedia:

“White defendants accused of crimes against black people and other minorities were often acquitted by all-white juries, especially in the South, even in the face of irrefutable evidence. An example is the trial of Roy Bryant and J. W. Milam.”

So I do think it’s a bit of a mixed bag.

source

Sort:hotnew top

idiomaddict@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
It can, but I’d still rather criminals walk free than people who didn’t do anything wrong be punished.

I guess it comes down to this: I think twelve randos are less likely to be racist than our legal system.

source
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
It is absolutely a mixed bag. Ideally, jury nullification would never be used, because none of our laws would be unjust or improper to apply.

But, we have had “Fugitive Slave Acts” on our books for the majority of our history: acts that criminalize providing aid and assistance to escaped slaves, or failing to deliver them to their “owners”.

We cannot pretend our legislature has never been corrupt, or will never be corrupt in the future. Jury Nullification is an important check on an out-of-control legislature.

source