Comment on What's wrong with a technocracy?
shani66@ani.social 1 day ago
What’s wrong is that definitions don’t mean anything these days. Maybe ever. Technocracy now refers to oligarchy but with tech CEOs specifically. I would also prefer a system where there are technical requirements before you when get the chance to try to get power.
EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I appreciate you agreeing with some technical requirements, but I want some perspective for why it’s not a good idea. It seems like we’re in agreement, though.
Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Its not a good idea because those requirements must be drafted by people, which tend to be the people in power. Historically, this ends in hand crafted requirements to get the people they want instead of the best people for the job. We also dont really require that. Plenty can be accomplished with flawed people in roles so long as those flaws dont override their responsibilities to their constituents. We do it at our jobs every day. It just so happens a flawed person in their role has the ability to control people’s lives. Which is why extremely centralized modes of power suck absolute ass.
EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Yeah, I actually agree with you there. I don’t like an extreme form of technocracy where some individuals dictate who is qualified to rule.
In practice, what I’m thinking of is socially delegating the requirements. Have various organizations dictate their own standards, and let them nominate the candidates.
Sure, one could just make their own jank Tariff Society and nominate their own pro-tariff candidates, but the people would see that and vote accordingly. The reputation of the organization would be self-regulating in a decentralized way without the extremely centralized power issues you mentioned.
Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
A decentralized coalition government would probably be the sweet spot for now. Anything based on merit or qualifications or whatever will just be seized by people with agendas or will be designed with a bias to begin with. Technological based ones will just be ruled by the people with the technology. Our only viable option right now are liberal democracies that actually invest in their populace’s education and electoral information. I’ve grown more towards anarchism in reality, as I no longer believe people can be trusted in a post-truth society. Even the EU is clamping down on climate protestors. Its authoritarianism all the way down.