Comment on [deleted]
scarabic@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoI see you’ve fallen into thinking that as long as we don’t talk about race, there’s no racism. And that actively trying to do something about racism draws attention to it, and is therefore racist.
The whole “I don’t see race” thing is empty. You can claim you don’t see race and so you don’t want to hear about it, while black people systematically get turned down for mortgages and have their houses appraised for less.
Maybe you don’t “see race” but society as a whole still does and you can see it in the numbers. Pointing that out and asking what we can do about it is not racism! That is not what racism ever was.
I would say that “not seeing race” is all well and good but you shouldn’t try to say that because you don’t think you see race, no one does, and therefore everyone should never mention it again. Do you see how that’s several leaps of logic thrown into one? And it makes you look like you’re desperate to bury any talk of the subject, which might be, you know… racist?
I agree the end state we would all like is one where no one sees race. But there’s no use pretending we are there when we aren’t.
Social_Conversation@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s not what I meant by that. If society is still seeing race then yes it needs to be pointed out and stopped. That’s literally what my post is doing: acknowledging and pointing out the issue. I’m just saying I think it’s a good start if the president isn’t racist and doesn’t prefer any skin shades over another. Because imo it’s the exact same issue when preferring what people call “black people” over what they call “white people” as preferring “white people” over “black people”, it’s the same racist ideology. And that needs to be pointed out and fixed on a global level in the USA so that no person gets preferred over their skin shade in no position!