Comment on Its truly amazing how some news sites like BBC don't lie, but spin the facts and actively gaslight
iamtanmay@wolfballs.com 2 years agoAt the place you read it, did they provide actual statistics ?
Without accurate data, any journalist can say the risk is less. But is it 0.1% vs 0.01% or 0.1% vs 0.099% ? And since vaccinated are still 100% likely to get Covid, does it actually reduce the risk if you get vaccinated + covid ?
There are no hard answers, just weasel words like "no scientific evidence to support claim" aka they know jack shit or "rare", which is a meaningless word - rare as in lightning strike level rare or rare like natural redheads ?
And then, when people do post really bad numbers from public reporting like VAERS, they say its not reliable because its self reported, completely ignoring that 50% of reporting is by medical professionals, and that CDC requires side effect reporting to VAERS
masterofballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
TBH I'm sure big pharma paid for the study and then paid all the news stations to run the "results" I don't believe it was a real study.
iamtanmay@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Well, they doctored the vaccine trials according to 1) BMJ whistleblower, 2)Veritas undercover video as well as 3) several trial participants.
Even that is small fry compared to Big Pharma's other mass crimes, like Pfizer bribing terrorists in Iraq, thereby funding terrorism (they don't deny the bribes, just that it constitutes funding terrorism - eyeroll)
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-court-revives-lawsuit-against-pfizer-others-iraq-terrorism-funding-claims-2022-01-04/
Or J&J being convicted last year of KNOWINGLY poisoning Baby powder with Asbestos for more than 30 years and hiding the evidence. Poisoning baby powder ! For the entire USA, for 30 years.....
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer/
Fuck, yesterday I read more about the Polio vaccine, the example everyone cites when they tell you to get the C19 vax. Turns out the whole thing was manmade and caused by heavy metal pollution rather than a virus.
Polio was not an epidemic before 1900s. Why ? Because it was caused by mercury in teething powders and later arsenic/lead pesticides and DDT. These created a vulnerable pathway from the intestines to the lower spine in children that ingested them, leading to infections from viruses and bacteria. This was demonstrated in animals given mercury and developing similar Polio symptoms
The Polio vaccine was aimed at one of the opportunistic viruses.... but of course did not cure the actual cause of the disease till much later when heavy metals were banned from these uses.
masterofballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
I've heard a lot of rumors about polio and the polio vaccine. I know a girl from Shanghai who had polio at birth and due to that is gimped. One of her legs is messed up and she limps and has her whole life. I could see it being some kinda heavy metal poisoning. It's just one more reason why medicine shouldn't be mandated. There are so many ways to look at the same evidence. People should have a choice on whether to take it or not. I personally don't consume anything made in a factory or a lab. medicine or food.