Comment on Godot Engine hits over 50K euros per month in funding
WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year agoOpen source has always meant under a free license. Being able to fork and publish your own versions is integral to the open source philosophy.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No, that is an enumerated freedom of the free software movement, not open source
WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
The same article also talks about the difference between open source and source available:
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Under that strict definition, software under the GNU GPL would not be “open source” because the license stays with the code, and is not truly “for any purpose,” which is the same deal with the Epic license: you may use, study, change, and distribute the Unreal source code, but it stays under Epic’s license.
If you are talking about the FREEDOM to fork and publish and share and whatever, then you mean Free software.
Image
heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
You are not allowed to distribute unreal source. From their FAQ:
Unreal Engine licensees are permitted to post engine code snippets (up to 30 lines) in a public forum, but only for the purpose of discussing the content of the snippet