Comment on USians - Uh, *we've all seen this* right?
Glasgow@lemmy.ml 1 week agoIf you can’t tell the difference between the nonsense Trump pushed out and this it sounds like you have a loose grip on objective reality. His points were incoherent and he got laughed out of court by judges he appointed.
The analysis shows they also hacked them in 2020 (to a lesser extent), that’s why he was so convinced the dems cheated. The public hated him that much they outvoted a literal vote shifting algorithm.
Also I’m not a lib, and it was completely eviden they were attempting to steal the election the whole time through other means. (Changing laws, removing poll booths strategically in POC areas, gerrymandering, purging voter rolls, etc).
He also can’t keep his mouth shut about anything and just admits to shit unprompted - which we’ve also seen.
archomrade@midwest.social 1 week ago
Trump and his allies cited exactly the same kind of ‘anomalous voting trends’ as evidence of vote manipulation. Unless you have something more substantive than ‘these ballots don’t look like we expected them to’ then this is exactly the same kind of non-evidence MAGA had.
The biden administration was exceptionally unpopular. Anti-Kamala democratic voters have been very clear about why they didn’t vote for her. Rather than reckoning with their complete unpopularity, democrats would rather blame their loss on ‘woke’ politics and vote manipulation.
Glasgow@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
They even have the publicy pushed smoothing algorithm that was used to make it less obvious
old.reddit.com/…/serbia_series_part_2_election_co…
archomrade@midwest.social 1 week ago
Why would a clandestine foreign agent publish malware on a public code repository? Some random reddit user claims to have found a repo on github that uses a publicly known username tied to a politically embroiled tech company and now we’re supposed to believe it was used to falsify an entire electoral system?
It doesn’t even pass the sniff test bud, what credibility are we supposed to lend to these anonymous users?
Glasgow@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
It’s a public piece of code with the admin password for the dominion machines that aligns with the discrepancies in the data.
The admin password was not public when the commit was pushed.
You’ll need to read the rest for yourself I’m afraid.
Glasgow@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
No they didn’t lol. Quote the evidence they presented to illustrate how daft it is in comparison. They failed at basic addition.
That poll is among people who voted, it doesn’t prove that’s why she lost the election even without considering the fraud.
archomrade@midwest.social 1 week ago
Do you have any evidence that isn’t based on the assumption that democratic voters simply wouldn’t split their vote? Or the assumption that people wouldn’t just vote for president and not any other offices?
Like, IP logs or recount discrepancies? Evidence of malware on the machines? Anything other than “this looks implausible”?