Comment on Templates of Cleo (my OC) holding a flag. (view body for more)
hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 year agoIt doesn’t matter what he argued. What matters is the judge’s decision, and that was about whether AI generated material is copyrightable in the first place. The judge agreed on a summary judgement based on the Copyright Office’s claims, not the defendants claims. That is legal precedent.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
That isn’t an AI ruling though. That just upholds the existing precedent that non-humans can’t hold copyright.
hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
If you refuse to read the ruling, then I don’t know why you’re even arguing.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
This has nothing to do with the guidance we are talking about.
hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
A judge’s ruling is not guidance, it’s precedent.