Comment on Templates of Cleo (my OC) holding a flag. (view body for more)
hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 months agoIt doesn’t matter what he argued. What matters is the judge’s decision, and that was about whether AI generated material is copyrightable in the first place. The judge agreed on a summary judgement based on the Copyright Office’s claims, not the defendants claims. That is legal precedent.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
That isn’t an AI ruling though. That just upholds the existing precedent that non-humans can’t hold copyright.
hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
If you refuse to read the ruling, then I don’t know why you’re even arguing.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
This has nothing to do with the guidance we are talking about.
hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
A judge’s ruling is not guidance, it’s precedent.