That gets to the root of the problem. We have “checks and balances” designed around the idea that separate institutions would check the excesses of each other. Even if you don’t accept the “Republicans and Democrats work for the same people” theory, well, now all three branches of government are majority Republican, and not even in a way where there’s significant internal division or strife, so it’s just a bulldozer. The stupidity of not including popular recall votes in the Constitution - or really, just not having a mechanism for popular referendums, vetoes, etc. - is I think its biggest fault. The “representative democracy” model is inherently flawed because you can corrupt representatives, while corrupting an entire population, while not impossible, is a hell of a lot harder.
IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
Check and Balance was intened to stop bad individuals, not an entire political party working in unison to destroy the system.
dx1@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Honestly, no amount of careful planning and design will restrain a society where enough people have gone completely insane. Look at “Israel”.