Comment on Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulator

Jaeger86@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Counterpoint: Consolidation in such a fast paced industry with a low barrier to entry isn’t as bad as physical goods consolidation. If Microsoft acts in bad faith, people just won’t buy games from that studio anymore, developers will just leave the company and start a new studio, free lance, or work for another party. It’s not like ABK was lighting the market on fire either. Microsoft is buying a trash heap and hoping to turn the internal culture around to bring back neglected IPs

  source

  • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Counter-counterpoint: When Activision bought and consolidated Blizzard an Blizzard North, they made it worse and people still slave away for them, and enough people buy their objectively inferior products to keep them going on life support to be sold again.

    They became a poster child of what’s wrong with the industry (Diablo Immortal) and nobody learned anything. Baulder’s Gate 3 did more to further a healthy ecosystem than any merger has.

    source
  • dangblingus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The gaming industry has a low barrier of entry?

    $69 Billion.

    source

    • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yes. Independent developers have regularly released smash hits like Stardew Valley.

      source

      • vokkez@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        And how many dozens of indie games came out that same week whose studios folded afterwards? Or how many devs didn’t even release their first games because they ran out of money during development? Or how many smaller studios who were making fun games got irresistible offers from big studios to buy them out? What about the engines that are becoming increasingly more hostile towards devs?

        source