Comment on Isn't OneDrive/Sharepiont the exact OPPOSITE of a shared drive?
ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah. 100% missing it. Having owners as well as the ability to set labels and restrictions is an incredibly important part of keeping data sensitive.
Zeth0s@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And you don’t need SharePoint for that
ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No but rarely are the labor hours spent to do it correctly. The same with foss, implementations is expensive most of the time and that’s why you pay someone to do it for you.
Zeth0s@lemmy.world 1 year ago
SharePoint concept and implementation is awful though. Better have different tools for the different tasks and track different types of artifacts and documents, than using SharePoint. And everything else in normal file system.
SharePoint is the typical mammoth that does everything and it does it extremely badly. But it’s Microsoft, so all companies must use it
ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Very much disagree. MS is better than what 98% of people will implement themselves.
JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sharepoint is actually very well made. It has great versatility and extensibility. The issue that you and others run into that leads to the assumption that sharepoint is bad, is that it was deployed by inexperienced or potentially incompetent people. Most of the time it’s just inexperienced people that aren’t given the time to properly train for a deployment and are told to basically wing it because “there’s no money to train you how to do it right” or other bs cheapskate business excuse.