But it saves the company money, instead of having front of house and back of house people. I have one worker that can do it all so they can cover their asses when they cheap out and lose a worker.
But it saves the company money, instead of having front of house and back of house people. I have one worker that can do it all so they can cover their asses when they cheap out and lose a worker.
fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
This is a very toxic approach. It will lead to low moral and poor performance from that employee. If the company has the money and time to train someone who doesn’t like the job, they can sepnd it on someone who actually wants it.
When the bad reviews for shitty service show up online, the company will wish they managed the situation better, but then it’s too late and the clients are going elsewhere.