Comment on Luigi Mangione Content Is a Challenge for Social Media Moderators - B…

<- View Parent
DdCno1@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

Youre seriously just parroting anti socialist propaganda

How utterly predictable.

Capitalism came to be the domination economic model in the 1600

Mate, stop reading Marx like a history book. Seriously. Captitalism wasn’t a thing yet and has many differences from the mercantilism of that time period, including importantly that it existed within a completely different system instead of encompassing all or even most of the economies of the time - and the wars of conquest, subjugation and extermination of other people was not a new invention of the colonial era. How is that any different from what e.g. Roman or Arab conquerors did centuries earlier, just to name two?

perpetuating warfare for profit, slavery to maximize profits and genocides to stifle any resistance or perpetuate the values of eugenics and racism

Are you even remotely aware of the crimes of Mao and Stalin? Their body counts doing exactly that far exceeds everyone else’s - but they did it under that red star you like so much, so it’s all right.

but yeah communism is bad because of famine

You never had to worry about your next meal, correct? I’m getting the distinct impression that you can’t even comprehend the horrors of e.g. the Holodomor or the Great Leap Forward. Yes, man-made famines are actually bad and communism is responsible for a few of those (which are also among the worst famines in all of human history) - or is that “anti socialist propaganda” as well? Was it Capitalist saboteurs, national-republican agitators or kulaks who were actually responsible?

while a large subset of the population live in squalor to support such opulent lifestyles of luxury

Ever seen Stalin’s dacha compared to the communal block houses that the ordinary Soviet citizen had to live in at the time, poorly heated, cramped homes where many families lived in the same apartment, with not an ounce of privacy or dignity? The gap between those two was far greater than between the average e.g. French home and a French leader’s home under evil capitalism right now. Hell, someone living on welfare in any Western European country 50 years ago was already enjoying a higher standard of living than your average Socialist worker could even dream of at the time.

Break down the word capitalism

Now you’re getting ridiculous.

the only time American capitalism ever allowed the working class to thrive was a brief moment of 4 decades after FDR legislated socialist policies

You’re so close to getting it, it hurts. Remember that part about tweaking and improving our societies and economics to counter the weak aspects of capitalism? Roosevelt did precisely that to counter the fallout of the Great Depression, which was a direct result of unregulated market capitalism. He was not a Socialist, far from it, but he recognized what worked.

It is also incredibly important to mention that the benefits of his economic policy were highly segregated. Whites were first in line, every time. This was not an attempt at egalitarianism.

Also fascism is capitalism in decline and monarchy is irrelevant because we are talking economic models.

You can not be serious. Fascism is noteworthy for not having any clearly defined economic policies, but if there is one thing it definitely does is meddle with the economy to a far greater greater degree than what capitalists are comfortable with. At the same, time, Nazism in particular was aligned with some (but far from all) big business interests and implemented a significant number of privatization efforts. Also at the same time, the Nazis were deeply suspicious of, among other things, free international trade and the stock market, core pillars of capitalism. It’s complicated.

And monarchies that were not capitalist were feudalist which is just a less refined version of capitalism.

No, you can’t just attach the “capitalism” label to economic systems you don’t like and clearly don’t understand. Feudalism - from an economic perspective - is closer to the moneyless utopia of true socialism.

The only thing missing from your comment is that any kind of socialist country that has already existed wasn’t actually true Socialism and thus doesn’t count. If I hadn’t mentioned it, it would have likely come up eventually, because you’re seriously doing nothing but frantically churning out every clichéd talking point that you can remember about this topic.

source
Sort:hotnewtop