Nabs

@Nabs@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Well...that was anticlimactic⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  It does, the IG that reviewed his case found it to be “urgent and credible” enough to be forwarded to congress.

  Again, the man can’t & shouldnt, go full snowden where he just dumps his load and defects to Russia, forsaking his or his family’s future.

  So that leaves us in the position of, hey, this guy has a record of credibility and others whove reviewed what he has say its credible and urgent.

  It is up to congress to investigate and then declassify.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Well...that was anticlimactic⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  You didnt read my comment.

  If the man “posted pics” he’d be risking his freedom and families future.

  He was found credible by not only his lawyers but the inspector general so much so that his complaint was levelied to congress.

  thedebrief.org/fact-check-q-a-with-debrief-co-fou…

  This is the site that ran the original article prior to in televised interview.

  This is part 1 of the fact checking / vetting they did on the whistleblower.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Well...that was anticlimactic⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  thedebrief.org/fact-check-q-a-with-debrief-co-fou…

  This is the site that ran the original article prior to in televised interview.

  This is part 1 of the fact checking / vetting they did on the whistleblower.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Well...that was anticlimactic⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Except his documents were all routed through the Intel Community Inspector General who sent them to congress calling them “urgent and credible.”

  And his lawyers are former Inspector Generals.

  You say this just because he didnt post things to wikileaks and defect to russia.

  The mans trying to make sure he doesnt go to prison.