ArkyonVeil

@ArkyonVeil@lemmy.dbzer0.com

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Indie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usage⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I do agree with you. But unfortunately making games is as much a business, as it is making art. Some things just aren’t that important to spend man hours on. Before AI, those textures would be just stock assets from stock art websites, hence the example.

  Cat’s out of the bag right now. And it will only get worse, unless generative AI use is made outright illegal. Which I doubt due to moneyed interests.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Indie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usage⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  As much as I hate to admit it, non-flagrant AI use will likely become generally accepted. The truth is that there’s a lot of content in games these days that sometimes just isn’t that important to dedicate man hours to it (Ex: Generic brick texture #431). The fact that this slipped through the cracks is proof enough.

  However, overly slacking to the point the end point looks obviously AI generated with just bad art. It’s pretty much akin to just delegating to some shady third party studio that works for pennies and spits out generic, low quality stuff. This will continue to be

  Ethics and copyright, are of course, different questions entirely. (In my opinion most AI provides are committing blatant AI infringement by using machines that crunch down copyrighted data and resell it back to you). But it seems like Silicon Valley’s marketing and public relations team managed to figure out the copyright one at this point. <>/

• Why civilians don't crowdfund bribe money for politicians?
  Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩ | ⁨37⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Petition: Bring the Affinity Suite to Linux - #AffinityOnLinux⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Sigh, it would be nice to have this petition before Affinity sold their soul to Canva. Oh well.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Mozilla's New AI Detector Add-On for Firefox⁩ ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I like the idea of a general AI detection approach. Problem is that it’s very easy to get false positives depending on the writer’s personal style. Accusing garbage of being garbage does nothing, but falsely accusing an individual of using AI when none is used will just lead to harmful witch hunt behavior.

  Also, putting your trust in a flawed tool like this, which might miss actual AI written speech (or human bullshit speech) will just give a false sense of security.

  Be careful out there fine folks. The unscrupulous used to lie using just humans, now they also use robots to do it.