Ruchbah
@Ruchbah@feddit.uk
- Comment on Chris Packham’s ‘instinctive’ bird sniffing is not a crime, police say 1 year ago:
After everything that’s happened the last few years I didn’t think I could be surprised by any headlines any more… but “bird sniffing is not a crime” are a set of words I never expected to see out together in a sentence.
- Comment on Asylum seeker children to get postcards after murals painted over 1 year ago:
You can pick a message and sign one of the postcards here: findothers.com/…/postcards-for-refugee-children
- Submitted 1 year ago to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk | 2 comments
- Comment on Woman in Teesside accused of carrying out own abortion to appear before judge | UK news 1 year ago:
with intent to destroy the life of a child capable of being born alive
These are extremely late self administered abortions. Absolutely tragic for all involved but although most people agree that a collection of cells or tiny foetus is not a person yet… when someone is at a point in the pregnancy where the baby can be born and survive then I don’t think it’s as simple.
Note: I’m assuming that’s what the line meant about being capable of being born alive (as the other recent case I was aware of was a really really late abortion and I think this is a similar case based on the posted link)
- Comment on We risk being seen as the ‘nasty party’ again, warn senior Conservatives 1 year ago:
Again? When did that ever change?
- Comment on Is charging electric car at holiday house "theft"? 1 year ago:
It’s not theft unless the owner specified in the conditions of the rental that car’s couldn’t be charged at the property. (Even then “Theft” is a strong word!)
That being said - there is obviously a big difference in charging your phone and charging a car and really we are at a point where this should be clear in all holiday rental agreements one way or another.
I don’t think the owner would be happy if someone just turned on all the taps in the house and left them running for the entirety of their stay. There is a sort of “fair use” which is assumed (if not actually in writing)
Question comes if car charging should always be assumed “fair use” or is that above and beyond? Or is it a gray area that just “depends”… Much better for everyone if all this is made as clear as possible in the agreement right at the beginning.
- Comment on Removal of murals for kids at Manston asylum centre cost £1,550 1 year ago:
_From analysis of detention logs, during the previous six months, 1,257 children had been held at Manston, including 26 who were unaccompanied. The average recorded time of detention for children travelling in family groups was two days 11 hours although 232 children had been held for more than 96 hours and the longest time of detention for a child was more than 19 days. Unaccompanied children were held for an average of 21 hours 44 minutes.
Families with children were prioritised at Manston, but processing remained slow at busy times and we observed some families with very young children waiting for several hours to be progressed into the family marquee. The family marquee was in good condition and provided baby food, children’s toys and changing facilities. However, at the time of our inspection there was no private area for women to breastfeed.
Some particularly vulnerable children were held for long periods. One case concerned a 17-year-old girl and her 10-month-old baby, who the girl said had been conceived after she was raped. They arrived in the KIU at 11:030am and were held until 10am the following day, when accommodation was made available._
…gov.uk/…/WJF-Manston-and-KIU-web-2023.pdf
———— Good thing that we spent £1,550 to get rid of those inappropriately friendly murals… I guess the baby food, children’s toys and changing facilities will also be removed because there’s definitely no children arriving here.
I feel really reassured now that the 1,257 children in the report weren’t really children (and the 10 month old baby was obviously a teenager with an intense fear of bright, cheerful colours and disney characters).
- Comment on Prison living costs rule scrapped for wrongly convicted 1 year ago:
Good. What an absolutely ridiculous rule in the first place