AnticitizenOne

@AnticitizenOne@leminal.space

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Online safety laws have failed to protect children in UK, Ofcom admits⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ve been having a look at the report, the conclusion is, bizarrely but predictably, that the legislation being completely ineffective means that they need to restrict things even more:

  “We will shortly be publishing our rapid assessment of what highly effective age assurance could look like for determining whether someone is 16 or over and are working closely with the government on the implementation of the expected new restrictions. We will continue to drive compliance with the Online Safety Act for services that fall outside the social media ban and to improve the experience of 16–17-year-olds.”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Online safety laws have failed to protect children in UK, Ofcom admits⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah, most people don’t even seem to realise this is happening. I sometimes think people treat me like I’m wearing a tin foil hat for even talking about this kind of stuff. I’ve written to my MP and she basically just gave me the party line and didn’t reply to my arguments against it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Online safety laws have failed to protect children in UK, Ofcom admits⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Agreed - very disturbing how common it has become. That’s actually why I joined Lemmy and I’m getting more and more into open source and distributed systems. I’m not going to be giving my ID to random tech companies just to use the internet. If there is nobody to threaten, there’s not a lot they can do to restrict these services, short of outright banning them. But I don’t think that would be possible to enforce.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Online safety laws have failed to protect children in UK, Ofcom admits⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Interesting, I didn’t know that. I must have missed it at the time. It is certainly disturbing how it seems that increasingly authoritarian control of technology and the internet seems to be favoured by almost every political party.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Potholes, bus fares and headphone dodgers: will Burnham’s strategy of ‘everyday fixes’ succeed?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  These certainly aren’t the big issues that governments should mainly focus on, but I think there is definitely something in this. A lot of people seem to feel the “death by a thousand cuts” that modern life seems to impose on us. Just small inconveniences, annoyances and costs we experience every day that are unfair and make our lives slightly worse. I think this is an opportunity for small things that are highly visible that actually make people’s lives better in small ways but don’t cost a lot. So I’m broadly in favour of this as long as it does not take up too much government effort.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Online safety laws have failed to protect children in UK, Ofcom admits⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  This is unsurprising unfortunately. It was never going to “work” in terms of their stated aims. What it has done is start getting people used to the idea of needing ID to use the internet. All to “protect the children” despite the fact it clearly achieves nothing in that regard.

  The plan seemed to have been to scan everything on everyone’s devices next: gov.uk/…/new-plans-to-stop-children-taking-sharin…

  Although this was a Starmer plan so I don’t know if it is still going ahead.