Tuuktuuk

@Tuuktuuk@piefed.europe.pub

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How long would it take a black Hole to fully absorb a person from event horizon to center of the earth style?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Does that still mean that the concept of “time” is not defined in a useful (human-understandable) manner in a black hole?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How long would it take a black Hole to fully absorb a person from event horizon to center of the earth style?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Doesn’t a black hole stretch time in a really weird manner? That would mean that no sensible answer can be given to the question. It could easily be that it takes either one billionth of a second or a trillion years, depending on where you are standing when observing the occurrence.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If WWIII broke out tomorrow do you honestly believe america would win?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  I can’t make head or tails of who would be fighting whom in that war.

  If a WW was to break tomorrow, it would probably be because of Trump making true his threats to attack NATO in order gain definite control over Greenland?

  Probably USA would be its own side without allies?
  Then there would probably be NATO as one side, most likely with Australia and Japan on the same team as NATO. And, I’d say, probably all of Southern and Central America.
  And the Russia and Iran with China? Pakistan would probably be on their side, so India would seek something else. More likely NATO than USA?

  But then again, WWIII would be such a big deal that it feels weird imagining it might end up a three-sided war. The loosest piece on this board is USA… If it allies with one of the sides, will that side be that of NATO or that of the Russia?

  Hm. Well, if it allies with China and the Russia, it gets super difficult for NATO to keep shit together. Then again, the Canadian border is not all that far away from DC, and Latvia is not far away from Moscow. We’d probably also have Ukraine on our side, and they can teach a lot about modern warfare!

  All in all: If USA manages to ally with someone, that side is likely to win. If it remains alone, it will probably lose. I would say that in a situation where USA doesn’t ally with anyone, NATO would be the side losing the least.

  But, in the end nobody wins in a war.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Me, a Lemmy instance admin, looking at the new Digg⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  What does Digg offer anyone that the Forumverse doesn’t?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Troll physics⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The fork of forklift B is under forklift A.
  If forklift A tries to lift formlift B, it cannot, because the fork of forklift B would get lifted up as well, but is stuck underneath forklift A.

  Therefore, you can achieve the precisely same result by removing forklift B from the equation and turning the fork of forklift A around so that it is pointing backwards and underneath forklift A itself. Now, with your own form underneath yourself, lift the fork up.

  It does not matter who the fork stuck underneath you officially belongs to, if what you are trying to do is to lift said fork up.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Troll physics⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  He might have been…

  …trolling.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why is kissing?⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Cheeks are a part of the human body where the different pheromones are easiest to record. They telll information about the immune system, and hold the “personal smell” that everyone has (and which isn’t really a smell at all, because pheromones are observed with a different system than actual smells are). When you get your nose near someone’s cheek, you record a lot of personal data about them in your subconscious.

  You receive information about how healthy your children would be likely to be, and also your subconscious gets irrefutable proof of “I am currently very close with person __.”

  Plus the other reasons mentioned here. But the most important one is that it’s a way to get your nose near their cheek.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Oh NO.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  More sense than cannon teens? What makes more sense than cannon teens?