IHeartBadCode

@IHeartBadCode@fedia.io

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Dead Economy Theory⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  Technically, yes, it’s an algorithm but all AI software is built out of algorithms. The critical difference is that traditional algorithms are fixed, static instructions written step-by-step by human engineers. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a self-learning algorithm. Instead of a developer programming exactly how to handle every single wireless interference scenario, the DRL model acts like an AI agent. It continuously learns, adapts, and teaches itself the absolute best optimization paths purely through real-world trial and error.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Dead Economy Theory⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Modern dense networks face a ton of unpredictable interference and variable traffic patterns. Wifi is a victim of it's own success. It's literally everywhere and thus all of these sources clobber the airwaves around them. This makes the traditional methods for traffic management and resource allocation of the airwaves too complex to fully implement.

  However, your usage of LLM isn't correct here. Wifi 7 doesn't use a large language model, it uses what is called a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) model. Wifi 7 isn't trying to be generative, it's being administrative. It's looking at the airwaves as they are, and attempting to find an optimization for the current situation it is in.

  In most cases the wifi coverage is not such that the NPU needs to step in. Traditional methods for transmission can be used, but in cases where you're walking in a mall or in an apartment complex. You have tons of APs vying for the same resource. AI is used here to listen to what's going on out in the world and come up with a method to target the highest bandwidth that can be achieved.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Dead Economy Theory⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  The intellectual poverty extends to the economics. Acemoglu has found that only 4.6 percent of tasks in the economy are currently cost-effective to automate with AI. His estimate for AI’s total productivity impact over the next decade: 0.66 percent. Goldman Sachs projected seven percent in 2023, before we began to see the shape of this thing. McKinsey projects between 0.5 and 3.5 percent annually.

  Yeah this is the thing I keep saying and everyone on social media keeps saying "Boo, AI bad."

  The reality is that AI presents a very real, very use thing a combination of linear algebra, calculus, and probability. There's lot of use cases for it. For putting it in all those use cases is not undoing the entire economy. We don't need anywhere near the AI data centers that techbros keep saying we need.

  Things like Bayes theorem have uses, I hate that it's gotten lumped into AI. Optimization via loss function is incredibly useful in a lot of domains. But none of can one-to-one replace human beings and it's wild watching all these "captains of industry" lose their collective shit.

  Someone is catastrophically wrong, and the people spending the money are not the ones with the Nobel Prize.

  Yeah, it's the techbros. They're taking really useful mathematical operations and functions and doing neat albeit useless tricks with it. Anyone who understands that actual fundamental math behind these models and does get too carried away with it will tell you, the reason...

  Over ninety percent of firms surveyed in 2025 reported no measurable impact on employment or productivity despite a quarter-trillion dollars in AI investment.

  is because people are being handed something that they have no idea how to use and the way they're being told to use it, is actually wrong.

  Engineers who did the spec for 802.11be (wifi 7) understood the nature of a channel matrix operation in MU-MIMO. Singular value decomposition benefits from vector dot multiplication and gradient descent minimization. This is absolutely perfect for AI, it's dang near what you'd want to use it for. And that's why Wifi 7 routers come with an embedded model and NPU to run the model onboard. 4096-QAM benefits from linear transformations through a Euclidean space. Mass matrix operations to perform those transformations are ideal with AI.

  Which is why I hate this notion that we've called these specific, highly useful operations, AI. Because they have way more application than neural networks, but since you have the hardware, Wifi 7 LDPC uses GAANs, because you've got the hardware. MLO and studying the interference in a particular space are also perfect for neural networks.

  There are all these uses and honestly it's crazy watching this insanity that is people like OpenAI, Claude, and so on. There's no way they're going to make good on their promises of being able to fire everyone. It just doesn't make any logical sense when you look at the various domains of math that underpin AI.

  And maybe that's because, the people who fly off the handle with AI, are people who take this math and see the human brain in those formulas. I think that's wild take, but my understanding of biology is limited. But I feel our brains are bit more complex than a two year study in College Calculus and Linear Algebra. But that's just my, not very well studied in biology, opinion. But I think that's where these people fly off the handle, they see activation equations, ANN layer transformation equations, and what not and think "human brain". And it's that thinking that's drove them to this insanity.

  There's no way the AI industry as it is can keep up. It is bound for collapse. But in all of that, the underlying math is still very important and very useful, and maybe that will get relabeled to neural networking or linear optimization? But what we are seeing is a party trick that can be done with these equations and it's apparently a trillion dollar party trick?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Valve raises Steam Deck prices by more than $200⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  AI's demand for memory is pretty difficult to really get across because there's a lot of complex factors, but whatever you can imagine is the demand, it's higher than that.

  You can look at pre and post AI to get a slightly better picture, but then the numbers don't look terrible and so the demand isn't as clear.

  2020-2023 primary customers were smartphones, laptops, PC. Data centers were eating about 32% of the global market for RAM. Monolithic DDR4/DDR5 was the main product and High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) was about 8%. Total memory set being sold was like 16GB kits to 64GB kits, obviously server kits were going out, just the majority was those mostly for PCs.

  2025 hits and the primary customer is AI Data Centers. To put it at scale, you have literally everything that uses memory (and I mean literally every fucking thing on this planet) and AI Data Centers. And the break between those two bins are 30% and 70%. AI data centers are consuming more than twice the memory of literally everything combined that uses RAM that isn't an AI data center.

  The primary RAM being made now is HBM, which is way more complex. 23% of all the wafers that will be used to make integrated circuits will be HBM RAM. And by wafers, I mean all the chips that will be made this year, lock, stock, and barrel. If you randomly picked up a wafer out of a fab you have a almost 1 in 4 chance to pick up RAM. And finally the average kit going out is 1TB to 2TB kits, which is a lot more than the old 16GB to 64GB kits.

  Now I mention HBM because it eats more wafer, that's because unlike DDR4/5 RAM, HBM RAM is a three-dimensional circuit. 12 to 16 layers of silicon is stacked on top of each other. So HBM consumes about 300% more silicon than other memory (not every layer is one-to-one in size). So you don't just have one fab making chips, you have several fabs making the layers.

  The next thing is that building fabs is complex. I hate trying to explain the complexity, but you can't do it overnight. Usually you have to build these things over the course of five years. Just to give you some idea of how technical the construction is. If you had a road within 500 feet of a chip fabricator sitting on a regular concrete floor, the car driving on the road would create enough shakiness in the Earth to cause the chip fabricator to bounce around too much. So when they build the place that have to literally isolate the small earth quakes humans walking around inside the place cause. This requires very complex floor building. And this is just the floor, not to mention how clean the place has to be kept, isolated as much as possible atmosphere, literally specific sections are under vacuum. It's massively complex to build ONE of these.

  The complexity comes with a price tag. Average cost to build one memory making factory is around $15B to $20B. It's serious cash, but even if you have 5 years and $20B, there's a specific bottleneck. ASML. ASML is the only company on the entire face of the Earth that makes the chip making machines. They've indicated that if you ordered a machine today, you can expect it roughly 1½ to 2 years from now. That's how many people have put in an order for the machines to make memory.

  So all that aside, there's one more bottleneck. HBM has to be stacked in layers, there are very few people on this planet that can do that, and they have years long backlog. And even then, most times the stacking fails. About 30% to 50% of all HBM is trashed because the layers fell apart. And the people who stack are entirely different people than the layer makers. But they're the same people that take that DDR4/5 wafer and cap it into that little black rectangle you see on your sticks of memory. So they have pretty much ~100% of their employees doing nothing but stacking layers of memory together.

  Another thing is economic prioritization, HBM is about 500% more than DDR4/5's price tag per GB. A fab producing wafers of DDR4/5 is making about $x.xx. A fab producing a couple of the layers for HBM is making about 500% × $x.xx on average (it's complicated because of the layers), so if three fabs are pushing out the layers that's a total 1500% more than consumer RAM (which again is roughly speaking because of the whole layer thing), even with the stacking issues. And the profit margin on HBM is 70% versus DDR4/5 before AI which was fingernail thin. SK Hynix was actually taking a loss on production of DDR5 at about -1.6%. So going from -1.6% to 70% profit has created a crowding out effect. Not to mention that since there was a bit of a bleeding out period after COVID, some literally stopped making RAM. Which has made the issue even worse.

  The last thing before I run out of characters is the AI growth. AI needs about 300% more memory every ten months. That's how fast these models are growing. If every chip maker was devoting 100% production to memory, they couldn't keep up.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Canada PM's Speech at the WEF⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  This is one of those speeches that's going to be a thing people study and read deep into, because it perfectly captures this moment in history and the generalized sentiment of the massive shift in the world today.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Free PC Game Keys to Give Away (Merry Christmas!)⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Good on you. I hope all the games find a good home.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How has there not yet been a leak of the Epstein files? Surely there is someone with access to them that could have been subject to worldwide pressure to let something out.⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  A lot of the Epstein files has been released. However, there are some things not released. Something I'll refer people to HR 4405

  Now in that, let's look at section C of that bill:

  would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary

  This is a big deal, because Judges ordering things to not be release CAN NOT be released no matter who says so. This is a separation of powers thing. A lot of things are withheld from the public because it's part of various legal cases. The most recent one I can think of is JP Morgan paying out that $290M to victims and there was like some amount paid to the Virgin Islands.

  Now the stuff that's wrapped up by the Judges, if someone leaks any of that, they are going to prison. And the people who are handling those files are very well aware of the consequences of if they say peep about what they've seen.

  This is the part where people are like "what if Trump destroys some evidence?" Well a lot of that evidence was turned over to the courts during Biden. So if the DoJ suddenly made things start disappearing, it's not going to match up with what the court already knows about.

  Many people already know what's in these files. They know what's going to be brought in legal cases. They also know what would happen to them it if they leaked anything they've already seen. And a lot of this information has been steady released to the public.

  So this brings up, what the fuck is Congress bitching about then? What Congress is attempting to do, is code into law a requirement for the information to released to the public no matter what might be contained, WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS AS NOTED IN SECTION C. What this law would do, is not just ensure that justice if done but also ensure that the public is aware of all the details behind the case.

  You know how like some court cases will happen and not everything presented in court is released to the public? Well this would codify into law the requirement to release all of that to the public. Of course, AFTER any kind of trial it was used in, if it wasn't released before a trail began.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨And what car did you learn in?⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  1979 Datsun 210. Eventually sold the thing for five cartons of cigarettes.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨‘Death to Spotify’: the DIY movement to get artists and fans to quit the music app⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Streaming is all the bad things about the music industry but made a thousand times worse. The pay outs, the requirement of specific laws surrounding streaming that make it different than every other method of music delivery, the lack of control by the consumer, the lack of any kind of ownership, the requirement of always online connectivity, and on.

  I don't want to be that boomer type person, but I'm pretty happy with staying with my CD and DVD collection that I have. I have a massive amount of portability, archiving, and it just works wherever I want to work. No fees, no internet required, and I have an immense amount of control over everything.

  This is just one of those things that I'm glad that I didn't get into this. It has sounded terrible since it was first pitched and I think it's only gotten worse.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Should Neutron Stars be Added to the Periodic Table?⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  A representation of a binuclear compound of element 10^(56) with an average bond length of 100 quintillion angstroms.

  Okay that was funny.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Autism has been announced!⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The whole acetaminophen is bad thing isn't a new one. It's part of a crack pot theory of oxidative stress and autism. The only problem is that oxidative stress is one of those very broad terms. The air you breathe can cause oxidative stress because of various types of pollution. Eating bacon can cause oxidative stress. Particular fertilizers used to grow a wide variety of plants can cause oxidative stress. Literally not getting enough sleep can cause oxidative stress.

  It's a really broad terms for random free radicals of oxygen in the body, which strip electrons, etc, etc, etc... It's also what brings about antioxidants. Chemicals that take the oxidative "blow" for your cells. And this is all sound science, but everyone experiences oxidative stress and not everyone is autistic, contrary to what apparently RFK believes by trying to pander this bullshit.

  Also, just right out the gate. The whole thing doesn't make sense for how it's supposed to work when we have fraternal twins who one is autistic and the other isn't. Which gets into the whole "likely a genetic thing" seeing how identical twins where one is autistic, the other usually is as well. And the difference in rates between fraternal twins and identical twins suggests a strong genetic link rather than environmental. But that doesn't rule out environment.

  But the thing is what RFK is pandering isn't new. There's been a ton of studies that associate oxidative stress to autism. But as the saying goes, association isn't causation.

  Also at the other end is their recommendation of folinic acid. Which, I can't, it's just Vitamin B bullshit stuff. The various B Complex is important in development for a child. This is why folic acid is given out to pregnant mothers. But there's no evidence to support that any formulation of Vitamin B prevents, slows, reverses, or cures autism. I just don't understand that segment of medicine where they've gone deep end with Vitamin B. It's important, don't get me wrong, but eating quintuple dosing of it isn't "curing" cancer so much as causing irreversible liver damage and possibly sending you into a seizure.

  It's whatever. Any form of legitimacy in the HHS disappeared with RFK. I think people are going to look at this as "oh yeah confirms my life long held bias" or "RFK is nut job." But as for moving the needle, this isn't going to move anything. Most doctors will not care that HHS made this announcement and will continue to act as if it didn't exist. Because there's a mountain of evidence that this is just crackpot theory shit.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Sadly your employer is likely in the right here. Oregon just recently passed a law requiring what you have indicated. Senate Bill 906. It goes into effect January 1, 2026. However, before that point in time, employers are not legally required to spell out anything about your employment to you at any given point so long as they fulfill the requirements to give you a timely W-2 when tax time rolls around.

  As for the $1232, that is quite the amount and I would not see that as reasonable. However, it really depends on if you want to call their bluff on attorney advisement. The letter looks like something they blew out their own printer, but doctors are petty as fuck and will drag your ass into court over six pennies, or at least in the time I've ever known them.

  However, take none of this as legal advice. More like a suggestion and you should absolutely look at whatever your local laws are. Oregon JUST got on the bus about requiring employers to provide exactly the documentation you are requesting. I know, but some States still don't have a legal requirement to provide paystubs. And Federal law absolutely doesn't require that, they only require the whole "things you need to fill out your taxes". In many of the States that don't require it, if your employer does hand it off to you, it puts a ton of responsibility on it being correct on the employer. So some will literally go to a CPA for this one off, which is a much higher rate than a regular book keeper.

  But yeah, your Government just recently addressed this, but it doesn't go into effect until next year. So sadly that new law does not help you here. However, you should absolutely speak with your department of labor to see if there are avenues you can take.