Hexorg
@Hexorg@beehaw.org
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
I think “pure” intelligence by itself is an algorithm. And as such an algorithm has no desire to do anything. Just like a web server has no desire to output web pages - it just does because it’s what the logic happens to make. It’s possible we need some sort of a quantum computer to achieve brain-like performance of intelligence - but I think intelligence is an algorithm specifically because LLMs exist.
Being able to pick an option is not necessarily a hallmark of cognition either - again a web server does that all the time. So I have a desire to think because it will end up getting me food and shelter and all the things I want. If we give a computer - a capability to think - it would have no desire to do so unless we executed the thinking algorithm.
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
Based on my research the intelligence by itself has no wants. Our wants come from being biological and evolving basic instincts and feelings like pain is bad, hunger, want to reproduce. All our other wants come from intelligence applied and predicting outcomes that maximize the biological wants. Without biological wants there’s not much to build off of.
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
Your statement implies AGI is good only for bad things (things I view as bad). That’s not the case as I see AGI being good for just doing things I don’t like doing. (AGI I’m asking about are not LLMs that we have now)
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
This is along the same lines I imagined it as well. And yes modern LLMs are nothing like what I’ve described. We’d need kilowatts of power per every single LLM conversation if we were to gradient descend them per conversation…. Funny enough human brain runs at like 10 watts. So I imagine there’s some huge paradigm shift from what LLMs do to what human brain does. You don’t get 1000 time efficiency boost from just putting all the world’s ram into it.
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
Hmm I see your points and I generally agree with them, except I don’t think we will ever collectively agree to ban AGI research before we invented it. As a result, it will happen eventually - maybe not in our lifetime but it will happen.
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
Oh I agree that “if these guys make agi” then we’re screwed. But I also don’t think Altmans and Amodeos of the world will invent AGI. However in that case the road isn’t smooth either. I dream of Star Trek like society but to get there is still going to be hard because it’s a disruption.
- Comment on How would you integrate AGI into society? 3 days ago:
What about the benefits like having super cheap doctors available at your home at your schedule? You doing think the benefit is worth the change?
- Submitted 3 days ago to technology@beehaw.org | 31 comments
- Comment on World-first biological data center packs 16 mn living human neurons 2 weeks ago:
It doesn’t run doom, it plays doom. Very different. We don’t understand the neurons well enough to translate doom to neural networks, but we can train them to play doom, due some definition of playing.
- Comment on World-first biological data center packs 16 mn living human neurons 2 weeks ago:
No in the matrix, smart machines captured humans and used their body heat to work.
Here dumb humans captured useless human tissue in hopes to run dumb machines.
- Comment on To grow, we must forget… but now AI remembers everything 9 months ago:
Its an interesting perspective, except… that’s not how AI works (even if it’s advertised that way). Even the latest approach for ChatGPT is not perfect memory. It’s a glorified search functionality. When you type a prompt the system can choose to search your older chats for related information and pull it into context… what makes that information related is the big question here - it uses an embedding model to index and compare your chats. You can imagine it as a fuzzy paragraph search - not exact paragraphs, but paragraphs that roughly talk about the same topic…
it’s not a guarantee that if you mention not liking sushi in one chat - talking about restaurant of choice will pull in the sushi chat. And even if it does pull that in, the model may choose to ignore that. And even if it doesn’t ignore that - You can choose to ignore that. Of course the article talks about healing so I imagine instead of sushi we’re talking about some trauma…. Ok so you can choose not to reveal details of your trauma to AI(that’s an overall good idea right now anyway). Or you can choose to delete the chat - it won’t index deleted chats.
At the same time - there are just about as many benefits of the model remembering something you didn’t. You can imagine a scenario where you mentioned your friend being mean to you and later they are manipulating you again. Maybe having the model remind you of the last bad encounter is good here? Just remember - AI is a machine and you control both its inputs and what you’re to do with its outputs.
- Submitted 1 year ago to technology@beehaw.org | 0 comments
- Comment on China is about to launch SSDs so small you insert them like a SIM card 1 year ago:
Apparently Nintendo switch 2 is using the standard already, so it might go over better than Sony.