testgoatpleaseignore

@testgoatpleaseignore@lemm.ee

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨After earning $544 million in its most recent quarter, Unity says even more layoffs are 'likely'⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Nothing strange about making sure the billionaire club executive who made decisions that are as good as could be expected from the billionaire club executive gets well looked after until he can find another job to continue being well looked after at.

  That’s the system working as intended.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Weird 🤔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Fuckin other political opinion motherfucker get fucked

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Weird 🤔⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Shutup nerd

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cities: Skylines 2 "absolutely cannot" have the decade of DLC features that the original game added | GamesRadar+⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Don’t they deserve to be paid for their work?

  Did I say they don’t? Jeez. Paradox ain’t some guy in his basement, currently they employ 650 people and they are valued at around US$160-170 million

  I even said obviously their strategy of infinite DLCs is working because they’re very successful.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cities: Skylines 2 "absolutely cannot" have the decade of DLC features that the original game added | GamesRadar+⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Absolutely you can wait for sales but that adds another barrier to entry

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cities: Skylines 2 "absolutely cannot" have the decade of DLC features that the original game added | GamesRadar+⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  I do play Paradox games and I own most DLCs for Stellaris, I’ve spent way too much on it, and the DLC situation creates a barrier for me to get into the other games. I find it overwhelming and lose interest quickly, when there are plenty of other things I could be doing.

  I agree in principle about the cosmetic options but the delivery leaves a lot to be desired

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cities: Skylines 2 "absolutely cannot" have the decade of DLC features that the original game added | GamesRadar+⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  I know, and I dont disagree necessarily but it still turns new players off

  I’ve been on both sides. I’ve got most DLCs for Stellaris for example and sunk thousands of hours into it. But I missed the boat on CK2 and can’t be bothered dealing with the similar swathe of DLC ($358.76 at time of writing, for a game released 10 years ago)

  I know you can pick and choose DLC but it is something I just can’t be arsed with, when I could just play something else instead.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cities: Skylines 2 "absolutely cannot" have the decade of DLC features that the original game added | GamesRadar+⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Currently on steam, the base game (c:s 1) with all DLC is $404.40

  It discourages new players a lot

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cities: Skylines 2 "absolutely cannot" have the decade of DLC features that the original game added | GamesRadar+⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Lol you’re in denial if you think the C:S2 makers aren’t going to try to cash in on paid DLCs constantly for the next decade

  It is a damn shame because it turns me off so many games these days, but I guess it must pay off financially because these companies - mostly sim/strategy games - keep doing it and don’t appear to be going bankrupt…