link to original reddit post by /u/DeForestDelpech
In this regard I don't understand the distinction between anarcho-communism, and a commune/worker owned firm/co-op, within anarcho-capitalism. Aren't they completely compatible? Co-ops and communes are even pretty compatible with the free-est market States of the world today, they do fine some places in the U.S. (Poor guyss get taxed, drug raided, &c, of course).
Ok, so maybe Ancomms have a different idea of property rights... but then what would Ancomms do about the community next door that is allowing private ownership/property rights, in an Ancap type of way? Destroy them? Raid them?
Ancaps would coexist fine and peacefully with the (voluntary) ancomm community next door.. again co-ops/communes are fine by me (and I think ya'll). Maybe I wouldn't choose to live in one, but whatever. Is that true vice versa?
I don't understand this, practically speaking. Isn't the "cap" or "comm" after "Anarchist" not saying much more than like... what type of grocery store you'd prefer to shop at, the type of housing arrangement you'd prefer, the type of employment/work arrangement you'd prefer, &c?
Trying to get educated, thanks!