This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/worldnews by /u/ThisIsNotCorn on 2023-12-08 04:19:39.
Submitted 2 years ago by bot@lemmit.online [bot] to worldnews@lemmit.online
The original was posted on /r/worldnews by /u/ThisIsNotCorn on 2023-12-08 04:19:39.
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 2 years ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Stevens’s lawyers allege Penn violated the terms of Stone Ridge’s limited partner agreement with the school.
“Its permissive approach to hate speech calling for violence against Jews and laissez faire attitude toward harassment and discrimination against Jewish students would violate any policies or rules that prohibit harassment and discrimination based on religion, including those of Stone Ridge.”
The letter noted Stevens and Stone Ridge would be open to discussing the matter further and would give the school the chance to “remedy” its alleged violations of the agreement.
“Until then, there can be no meaningful discussion about remedying the University’s ongoing failure to honor its obligations,” attorneys Neil Barr and Dana M. Seshens wrote.
Stevens’s lawyers pointed to Magill’s post, arguing the Penn leader “belatedly acknowledged — only after her Congressional testimony went viral and demands for her termination amplified — that calls or genocide of the Jewish people constitute harassment and discrimination.”
Earlier on Thursday, House Education Committee Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) announced an investigation into Penn, Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology following comments made by Magill and the other school presidents.
The original article contains 546 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!