This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/worldnews by /u/IWantMyJustDesserts on 2023-11-21 17:56:32.
Submitted 2 years ago by bot@lemmit.online [bot] to worldnews@lemmit.online
The original was posted on /r/worldnews by /u/IWantMyJustDesserts on 2023-11-21 17:56:32.
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 2 years ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Two protesters were “reasonable” in calling Iain Duncan Smith “Tory scum” outside the Conservative party conference, the high court has ruled, in a rejection of an attempt to overturn their acquittal.
In response to a request for a judicial review from the director of public prosecutions, the high court found that Judge Goldspring, who is also described as a chief magistrate, had made the important finding that “the use of Tory scum was to highlight the policies” of Duncan Smith, and that this was relevant to the “reasonableness of the conduct” in relation to the rights of freedom of expression and assembly.
There was nothing to undermine Goldspring’s conclusion that criminalising the words “Tory scum” would be a disproportionate interference in the two protesters’ rights, the high court ruled.
As Duncan Smith crossed the road, an individual ran up behind him and placed a traffic cone on his head.
Neither of the protesters had been aware of or encouraged the act of putting a traffic cone on Duncan Smith’s head.
Their comments came after Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner, had been recorded at her party’s conference describing the Conservatives as “homophobic, racist, misogynistic … scum”.
The original article contains 614 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!