I fail to understand how this is different from the status quo. Like, pure slop is ruled out, but it should have been in the first place.
Wikipedia has banned AI-generated text, with two exceptions
Submitted 1 day ago by remington@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
https://www.howtogeek.com/wikipedia-banned-ai-generated-text-in-articles-with-two-exceptions/
Comments
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 day ago
sik0fewl@piefed.ca 1 day ago
Sometimes you have to just right it down to save time arguing later.
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 day ago
As an editor, I’m not going to point out the egregious error here.
byte_0verflow@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
TL;DR: The two exceptions are for refining the writer’s text and for translation
30p87@feddit.org 22 hours ago
Didn’t they actually “discover” that translating (and refining) introduces huge errors?
jherazob@beehaw.org 20 hours ago
The actual rules for LLM translation seem aimed at covering that