Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

This Is the Real Reason Why Documentaries Are So Popular Now

⁨11⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨ooli3@sopuli.xyz⁩ to ⁨Television@lemm.ee⁩

https://www.vice.com/en/article/this-is-the-real-reason-why-documentaries-are-so-popular-now/

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • hopesdead@startrek.website ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    The problem I have is the quality of the film making. Regardless of the content, if it isn’t well made, probably wouldn’t see through the whole thing.

    source
    • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Adding to that, there’s so many of these docuseries that are like 4 or 5 one hour episodes when it could easily be condensed to a sub 2 hour film. They just drag it out for no reason.

      source
      • hopesdead@startrek.website ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Especially with true crime, the way things are presented could alter how the content is perceived. For example, Making a Murder took time to walk the audience through the entire trial (I’m not going to debate the perception the film makers left out important facts that influence the narrative).

        On the flip side a more recent series like This Is the Zodiac Speaking, only focused on one suspect, never questioned the testimony of the children as being faulty memories or fact checked well known details about the crimes mentioned. My point is, this documentary was on a subject that was better well known and didn’t aim to present the children as telling their own side of events; it straight up makes the assumption what they said must be true because they personally knew ALA. On top of this, they featured Robert Graysmith, the author of the book Zodiac which is well known for being factually inaccurate, and doesn’t challenge his research. And at the end, the film makers failed to get the DNA test results for a test they commissioned. What deadline existed that they couldn’t tell the viewer what the result was?

        Sorry, that documentary in particular irritates me for how factually inaccurate and onesided it was. My overall point is that true crime in particular seems to just be looking for whatever will get views. Not a lot of the documentaries that have come out in this period have produced well made series or ethically honest content. Is it entertainment or is it bringing awareness to what occurred or the people affected?

        source