I think this would be a step in the right direction.
Chrome or Chromium? Because it’s logically impossible to have Chrome without Google.
Google must sell Chrome to end search monopoly, US prosecutors argue | Business and Economy News
Submitted 5 weeks ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to technology@beehaw.org
Comments
unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 5 weeks ago
HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 weeks ago
Could you expand on that? Why couldn’t Chrome exist like Firefox does?
unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 5 weeks ago
I guess you could keep Chrome as it is running in another company… But Chrome is Google-service-clogged Chromium, still making money for Google and changing literally nothing in terms of monopolistic behavior by Google. I don’t see the benefit in this division.
millie@beehaw.org 4 weeks ago
I would be stunned if the DoJ knows the difference between Chrome and Chromium.
Steve@communick.news 5 weeks ago
They also suggest splitting off Android and sharing data. But that seems barely a start. If you’re going through the effort to take them down, take them all the way down.
They should split off nearly every major product and service. Make it a couple dozen separate companies.