A 15-year-old boy has become the first person to be charged with riot over the recent disorder that swept towns and cities across England.
Almost all those involved have so far been charged with violent disorder, which carries a shorter maximum sentence than the offence of rioting. On Wednesday a judge, the recorder of Hull, suggested that prosecutors should consider the riot charge for people alleged to have played a central role in the disorder.
On Thursday the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said that a 15-year-old boy had been charged with riot after disorder in Sunderland. It said more riot charges would follow.
The riot charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, whereas for violent disorder the maximum is five years. The boy’s defence lawyer, Chris Wilson, told a hearing that the new charge may have “far wider repercussions”.
The district judge Zoe Passfield adjourned his case for two weeks as she said the new charge must have come as a “surprise” to him. She told the teenager: “The prosecution now want to bring a further charge of riot.
“It is an unusual situation when a new charge is brought after the person has pleaded guilty and it opens up complications that I and the lawyers need to consider carefully.”
Boy, 15, is first person charged with riot over recent English disorder
Submitted 3 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/15/boy-riot-charge-england
ilovecheese@feddit.uk 3 months ago
So they will be going after the groomers next, right? Right?
Emperor@feddit.uk 3 months ago
I think they are generally calling them “influencers” and there have already been a few people charged for posting online.
ilovecheese@feddit.uk 3 months ago
It’s good they’ve started with the online ‘influencers’, but is it likely that so many young (11-15 iirc) kids became so radicalized so quickly just from these online sources?
ilovecheese@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Interesting downvotes.
So people want the adults that radicalized these kids to get off with no punishment?
That’s a hot take I didn’t expect from here!
FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 3 months ago
I didn’t see it earlier but I’d have assumed this was saying the police should be chasing Rotherham child abusers not wasting time on riots.