Wikipedia is only good for weapon history as far as I am concerned.
Oh look, Wikipedia's changed the definition. I keep saying it, we need an alternative to the biggest propaganda machine - Wikipedia
Submitted 2 years ago by iamtanmay@wolfballs.com to freeforum@wolfballs.com
https://wolfballs.com/pictrs/image/37aebd9e-1e4c-45ce-9191-0c097d49743c.png
Comments
Shepherd1776@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
squashkin@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
to me it's good for most things, as long as you mentally filter it through your own lens knowing it has a liberal bias
like more objective things like math aren't tampered with. just gotta double check sources
squashkin@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
if they're going to play a semantics game, are there any definitions we should be breaking down