Submitted 8 months ago by atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org to fediversenews@venera.social
Here’s a table of which Fediverse servers are federating or de-federating Threads.
Of the top 10 most active servers it lists, eight of them are federating, one is offering limited federation (infosec.exchange), and one is de-federating Threads (mas.to).
Of course, there’s some notable large servers missing from this list. For example, is misskey.io federating with Threads?
@atomicpoet @fediversenews think it's worth noting that some of these are tentative decisions.
My instance currently blocks but the decision was explicitly framed as seeing what the impact of Threads is on fedi, and opening up if it's not large and negative.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews i can't imagine facebook wanting to federate with misskey.io with the actual content that's on that instance
@ezra @atomicpoet @fediversenews surely Meta can already adequately deal with Japanese culture on its platforms.
@ezra @fediversenews Currently, they’re federating with pawoo.net. However, federation is one way: Threads users can’t see pawoo’s posts.
@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org @fediversenews@venera.social Is it possible to block the threads.net domain, but not all fedi accounts that are linked to threads? If there is a way to do that, I'd like to know it myself.
@kotaro @fediversenews What do you mean by “linked to threads”?
@atomicpoet he's probably referring to a whitelist kind of situation where you can only keep following a few accounts, while blocking the rest of Threads.
@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org @fediversenews@venera.social Because the current threads are not yet directly participating in the fediverse, right?
All the news is saying is that it is now possible to mirror posts on the threads account to the mastodon and misskey accounts.
mackaj@mastodon.me.uk 8 months ago
@atomicpoet
I wonder where they get their user numbers from. They're a lot less than I would expect to see.
@fediversenews