Submitted 2 years ago by masterofballs@wolfballs.com to freeforum@wolfballs.com
https://wolfballs.com/pictrs/image/dd1d329c-5540-4b97-be86-585ef46fe666.png
Yes women can be rocket scientists. But living a lonely life in a lab verifying numbers in an excel sheet being bossed around by people that hate her isn't nearly as amazing as creating life. The mother , the wife is extremely important to society. She builds the world child by child and each life she creates is an investment in her and our future.
Men are expendable. That's why we are sent to war first. You really cannot replace a good mother.
Hypothetically, they can be rocket scientists. I have a quote from Dennis Ritchie that puts this into perspective. He was the inventor of 'C' the language that most other computer languages are written in.
He said that he wanted to be a scientist, but he was not smart enough so he became a computer programmer instead. Something to that effect.
Very few people can do real science, most are glorified researchers. Only a very tiny minority of women can be scientists in the true sense of the word. They will never discover anything new, for the vast majority, no one will remember what they have done.
So while it is possible that there exists maybe 3 women in our time that could be true scientists.... The odds that any particular female you are talking to is one of those 3 is practically nonexistent.
But colleges will gladly take your money and give you a science degree, and since you have that degree and $300,000 in debt - you are a scientist without children doing lab work.
And since you have $300,000 in debt you won't find anyone worth marrying because you will only marry someone with a degree who will also have $300,000 in debt. The 'Woman in Stem' is a perfectly designed trap to turn women into hopeless worker drones.
For the majority of women this actually turns into something like, "Motherhood is servitude, I don't need no man, so I'll work a register at Pottery Barn instead."
"I value my career of making change more than creating life."
It's a bad trade off.
IDK, Men should be men. Fight for the women that are worth fighting for and ignore the rest.
Feminists lied, biology is inevitable. Girls can't fuck around in 20s and expect a good family. Men don't have the clock but die earlier and endure violence - 98% work fatalities, 95% crime victims, 90% homeless + imprisoned
By 35, only 5% of a woman's eggs remain, with high chance of abnormal pregnancies. A girl at 30 can realistically have 2 kids with a year gap (9 + 12 + 9 + buffer for miscarriages). That's the end of their fertility
3 to 4 is doable if you start at 30 but its much harder. 2 would likely be the average. I do know women that gave birth at like 48.
Luck is a big factor. 30 yr old girl with shouldn't take such a risk. Break from career a couple years earlier than risk not just kids, but also the man leaving because of it. Imagine the guy who stuck with her for years and after many failed attempts, she is 35. Does he abandon everything and look for a younger girl ? Difficult call.
I feel bad for girls that age. Media, politicians lie and mold them when they are young. Hopefully they will mentor other young girls and break the cycle.
wigglehard@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
The mother is supposed to nurture but ideally the father raises and guides the children male or female and protect them like god with us