Where did this take place? Somewhere in Canada?
I thought it was April Fools.... it wasn't
Submitted 2 years ago by iamtanmay@wolfballs.com to freeforum@wolfballs.com
https://wolfballs.com/pictrs/image/afc0ae9b-09e9-41bf-8165-2991a9512fd0.png
Comments
kiwiheretic@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
iamtanmay@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
C.A.L.I.F.O.R.N.I.A :D
kiwiheretic@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Why do people want to live in California? It sounds like a horrible place.
squashkin@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
interesting post because I wanted to post and ask how we could help the homeless
one person I know suggested we make brochures of all the services available to such people so that they can make use of what services are available
I was thinking that nonprofits could be formed as a force like police that, if a homeless person is spotted, a trained official of sorts could go and reach out to them, offering them transportation to a shelter or other things.
Problem with some existing nonprofits that help homeless is, I think they are authoritarian. This is maybe a "libertarian" critique I had of them. Like I don't care if certain homeless people are drug addicts, necessarily - I do care and want them to be off drugs, but it is not necessary for solving their homeless problem. There are people with homes that are drug addicts, so it is a separate problem to me. But some homeless shelters I think try to police their drug use, which may be well intentioned, but then these homeless people then turn away from these groups, and don't get the needed help.
On a related note, I have experienced this kind of thing with a ton of random interest hobby groups. Lots of requirements I have no interest in fulfilling, so I end up avoiding the group. I think homeless face the same issue, so I think part of solving the homeless problem requires allowing them more freedom to be themselves.
I think there are also incentives for society to help the homeless, for those who aren't interested in the altruistic motivation of helping them: more profits to society, less crime, more innovation, more friends, etc. - not ever homeless person is irresponsible but may have fallen in to difficulties they had trouble planning for.
But please let me know if you have any ideas on this topic, I intend to make a standalone post at some point.
It is disgusting these politicians are so out of touch with the cost of rents and how they carelessly dismiss homeless people to the streets when they are seeking some shelter.
iamtanmay@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
You cannot help the homeless, because the problem came from bad governance, and is local to shitty Democrat cities - LA, NY etc
If you notice, this isn't a theme in Republican areas.
The Democratic congresspeople have utter contempt for the homeless - a problem that they created
mayonesa@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
There is only one way to help the homeless: asylums.
A small minority of them may have fallen on hard times, but the vast majority have mental health problems and drug addictions.
Whatever you give them, they will shit all over and set on fire.
I think we should consider them a weapon and ship them all to Russia where they can weaken that place instead.
kiwiheretic@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Once upon a time it may have been true that if someone was homeless it was because of extremely bad personal decision making. I don't think that kind of thinking is relevant today.
However, I would be interested to know what kind of drugs people are on today, and given that they are probably worse drugs now than 20 years ago, do people actually ever come off them?