Comment on Civic Nationalism vs Ethnic Nationalism
squashkin@wolfballs.com 1 year agodo you think women were held accountable in the past? Was it like the 1960s when it stopped, or earlier?
definitely didn't used to be like this. but there are also stories of men being falsely accused like in the Bible so it may be an ancient problem
also I don't know the timeline on things, but there used to be more ethnic churches with Catholics. Orthodox are still organized somewhat ethnically I think. Protestants idk, not as much?
anyway in the past it doesn't seem like it was really even a question, a lot of the ethnicities just stayed separate, but there was also overlap but it was a minority of the population so didn't pose a question to the stability of these ethnicities. today things seem very different.
I see more mixed couples out in public. I think whites having a kind of "dominance" (being majority, etc.) might lead to race mixing to even it all out, as the white men or women feel held to a higher standard when dating each other and can escape that higher standard by just dating another race. idk what incentives would override this for a lot of people.
> white guy rejected by lots of white women just dates eager non-white. white woman not willing to be held to any standard just dates non-white man as white women are racially ranked higher in attractiveness on certain preference polls and so non-white men are often eager to date them.
charliebrownau@wolfballs.com 1 year ago
No
We definally need a new social model structure
I would call it samism
Everyone is held to the
SAME STANDARD
SAME SENTENCE
SAME PUNISHMENT
Give that method a go for 10 years to 20 years
Once women demand double standards offer a different method and it falls apart since they are biolgiically geared not to be held accountable
Then we offer Actual Patroracy and strip women of 'rights'
They go back their proper genetic gearing design by the realm creator
They have a proper role in society being single teachers or single career women from 20 to 35 isn't it it goes against genetic design and the biological desire of women
Women have a responsibility to keep the population going
They can be strong and indepant after the age of 45 They want to to work, educate or be alone once the 1-4-8 kids have left the nest
Without International Centralised Governance
Same with other races, without forced integration and forced acceptance
It all collapses since its only maintained with STATE FORCE with armed order enforcers, corrupt courts and central banking cartel
Without the Jewish and state interference they will need to fall back on
Human rights is an World Jewish weapon against whites and goyim
If anyone objectively looks at "HUMAN RIGHTS" it does NOT include Freedom of Speech Freedom of Self Defense + tools to enable this
Image
Image
squashkin@wolfballs.com 1 year ago
so I am kind of "conservatarian"
the problem with respect to women is we have neither a libertarian government towards them, nor traditional conservativism
if there was basically a free market, women would not be able to compete against men, so men would naturally rise up above them in the market in general. This does exist today to some extent but it's being attacked. Marriage "contracts" would thus respect the property men work for, rather than the wacky divorce court law arrangements that exist today. So feminism wouldn't be the same kind of problem.
or if we had a conservative government, the women would be excluded from certain positions of authority by force or principle. The Christian view is that wives are to be submissive to husbands and to obey them (Ephesians 5:22). So the men naturally are in charge under this view of government, which is an extension of the view of the family.
we have neither of these really. the civnats are basically feminist and treat women as equals using their political authority. And we don't have the free market ability to "discriminate" against women with arguably unConstitutional laws like the Civil Rights Act. However we do still have the ability to freely associate with men and exclude women from private small businesses and organizations in practice (for example, the amish still exist and seem to enforce norms like this). And we don't have to vote for women if there are suitable male alternative candidates - things like this. So not all hope is lost. But there are constraints to work with.
charliebrownau@wolfballs.com 1 year ago
What has conservatism actually conserved , if anything ?
All these 'rights' are weapons to destroy out
Neo Conservatism is created by Zionist Jews
All statism is slavery
The ONLY system I see that would work is a legal binding contract with marriage with clear definitions and real consequences for divorce
Contact between male, female , family and community
Even American studies ADMIT that the most common way for women to get rich is DIVORCING MEN
Also the UN admits that the LONGER you 'educate' women the lower the birth rate thus the push for 'higher' 'education and women getting a 'carreer'
its all based on STATE forced Egalitarianism , which ALWAYS has to deny the REALITY, Common trends and Biolgical make up of different groups
Also Multi Culturalism aka Multi RACISLISM relys on the State System courts Police
Hard enforcing, covering up and hiding the truth about different groups and refusing to hold all groups to the same EXACT standard, punishment and sentencing
Even Korea and Chinese governments refuse to hold women accountable and pander to simping and female nature