CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Based on the amount of vitriol I’ve personally received on this site for renting one property while I am temporarily relocated to attend school, the answer is yes.
For some reason everyone views being a landlord as easy money. But in reality returns on investment are worse than the stock market for being the landlord of a single family home.
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 week ago
Then sell it, and put your money into the market. Now you’re no longer a parasite, and you’re making more money. Win/Win.
CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Maybe I want to move back into it… And selling has a 10% cost after realtor fees and closing fees.
woop_woop@lemmy.world 1 week ago
So then it’s not worse?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 week ago
If you are operating rationally and you actually believe your ROI on the rental property is lower than the stock market, you would transfer your wealth to the market. Since you are not, you are either behaving irrationally, or you don’t actually believe your ROI is lower than the market.
Your ability to move back into the property is a return that you have not included in your evaluation. The 10% cost of selling is a sunk cost fallacy.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yikes, what a nightmarishly unempathetic take on this situation