Comment on ‘It gets more and more confused’: can AI replace translators?
Boomkop3@reddthat.com 5 days ago
Try deepl, it’s pretty cool! And not just another gpt like thing
I’ve used deepl, and as a “quick solution/I’m fine with the occasional error” translation service it’s definitely better than Google. As a commercial platform probably tracking more than I personally care for, trying to corner a market share —not so much.
But neither of the above are fit for translating books of any kind (except perhaps as a joke to emphasise just that). And I’m still doubtful of the “AI” models doing any better.
DeepL has always used machine learning, and they already switched to LLMs for some language pairs – not rebranded ChatGPT, but their own stuff. They’re also quite open about the model not being perfect, they’re advertising with things like “blind tests show our results sound more natural than the competition”, “our model output needs fewer edits than the competition”, etc.
And yeah they definitely didn’t edit this one much from the English original. English sentence structure and American idiomatics all over the place, it’s tedious to read. Quite, but not entirely, as bad as this.
14th_cylon@lemm.ee 5 days ago
it is not “replace human professional” cool.
Boomkop3@reddthat.com 5 days ago
Obviously, and they’re not going to anytime soon
DdCno1@beehaw.org 5 days ago
Except that I know first-hand that German government institutions are already using this exact tool in order to make up for the chronic lack of translators. They are translating texts into languages they don’t speak, which means there’s no going over the output to correct for mistakes.