Comment on I'd have to hear her argument, but...

Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  No because a fetus doesn’t mean the criteria of having a soul (:

  Also sperm most certainly doesn’t

  source

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    There was never any such ideas being part of it. It affected plantlife and bacteria as well. The idea of a soul to begin with is not even supported by science, although most people consider it to have some kind of validity, even if it’s not quite definable. But the relevant issue is that it’s all life period.

    source
  • Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Well OOP said all life, include bacteria, then they most certainly include sperm and fetus.

    source

    • piecat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Macroscopic creatures are made of different types of cells and stuff… what constitutes a living thing?

      People didn’t lose half of their cells, it was all or none.

      source

      • Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Emm yeah but that’s the joke.

        source

        • -> View More Comments