We aren’t supposed to accept that. We can simply not use their software. And as users that’s the only power we have on devs. But it’s a power that only works on devs who are interested in having many users.
Comment on Why 'free' proprietary software will always end in tears
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago[deleted]
pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Sure, but then we only have corporations left to turn to if open source devs don’t wish to do what is best for users.
Kind of goes against the point of the original post.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Plus if something has been ignored for so long that it basically needs a full rewrite of some aspect then even if you have the skills to do it, you can’t realistically do it because it’s such a big problem.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Yeah, agreed.
compcube@lemy.lol 2 months ago
Have you tried hiring developers to do the work that you want?
I just cannot understand the entitlement of demanding some open source developer must do particular unpaid work that users are demanding.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
I’ve thought about it before, might just do it, but can’t pay mich.
Sure, however, this then apart from paying them goes against the original post then, doesn’t it?
Either we can be paying customers of a corporation and hopefully get what we want by leveraging social pressure or we have to put up with whatever open source devs decide, they might not even accept payment.
A pretty dire situation to be in.