With open source, you can fork the project.
It should be okay for an open source maintainer to say “no”.
Comment on Why 'free' proprietary software will always end in tears
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Sure but the same could be said and often is said for open source projects.
Open source devs often have a particular goal or vision in mind and will any attempts to give the users what they actually want, either through issues or pull requests.
I’ve seen it so many times in open source projects, they love having that power over others and become mini dictators.
compcube@lemy.lol 2 months ago
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
[deleted]compcube@lemy.lol 2 months ago
Have you tried hiring developers to do the work that you want?
I just cannot understand the entitlement of demanding some open source developer must do particular unpaid work that users are demanding.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
I’ve thought about it before, might just do it, but can’t pay mich.
Sure, however, this then apart from paying them goes against the original post then, doesn’t it?
Either we can be paying customers of a corporation and hopefully get what we want by leveraging social pressure or we have to put up with whatever open source devs decide, they might not even accept payment.
A pretty dire situation to be in.
pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
We aren’t supposed to accept that. We can simply not use their software. And as users that’s the only power we have on devs. But it’s a power that only works on devs who are interested in having many users.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Sure, but then we only have corporations left to turn to if open source devs don’t wish to do what is best for users.
Kind of goes against the point of the original post.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Plus if something has been ignored for so long that it basically needs a full rewrite of some aspect then even if you have the skills to do it, you can’t realistically do it because it’s such a big problem.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Yeah, agreed.
Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
That might be the most jaded take on open source I have ever seen. Yes, sometimes open source devs ignore user feedback and it can be frustrating, but it is 100% volunteer work and they don’t have any power over us because no one is forcing you to engage in digital communism by using open source projects. We have to remember that open source devs are building what they need and want and then sharing that with us for free.
I strongly believe that the truly power hungry individuals go into middle management at a for-profit where they have real power over others. There they hold your career in their hands and they know it. They can fire anyone they dislike and they often do. Destroying careers on a whim is infinitely more tyrannical than any open source dev could ever be.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Correct, it is jaded. We have watched a lot of devs become worse and worse over time, ignore prefectly goid requests or instead of implimenting an already existing solution to a problem find workaroubd to that problem instead which then go on to not work forever.
So, if open source developers do not want to do the work, which is fair then either we have to create a new movement that is more community driven, or go back to corporations which the latter at least seems like not a great sitaution to be in.
millie@beehaw.org 2 months ago
That’s a really weird way of framing a hobbyist who isn’t being paid using their free time to code what they feel like coding. It seems to me that people who show up and make demands about what someone else does are literally attempting to dictate how that person spends their time. Someone coding what they want, rather than coding what other people want them to code, is just… independent? Autonomous? Do you really think that someone spending their free time how they want to constitutes being a ‘mini dictator’?
It sounds to me like some end users like to have power over others and feel entitled to dictate how those who make the things they use spend their time.
blindsight@beehaw.org 2 months ago
… Or pay them for it!
There’s a prolific open-source dev that makes many plugins and themes for a widely-used OSS platform. He’s quite open when asked for new features of it’s something he’s already planning on doing anyway (with no guarantee timeline) or if it’s not. But if it’s a reasonable ask, he’ll always mention that he can prioritise its development if they fund it. He even posts his current contractor rate; it’s quite transparent.
I think more OSS devs should be more open like that. “Yes, I can do that feature request. Sounds like about 2-3 hours work. My hourly is $120 for correct work. Email me here if you’re interested and I’ll send a contract.”
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
There are two problems there:
One is that not all open source developers accept payment, this is accurate, we have come across that refuse to be paid for their work and not everone has the money to pay for it.
This forces, we believe, people back into the freemium etc model. So really there don’t seem to be a lot of good solutions here, which seems to go against the original post.
Either folks somehow pool together to have enough resources to pay open source devs, we put up with whatever they decide to do, we create a new movement focused more around what the community wants or we go back to corporations, most will probably choose the latter as there’s less tension there.
Something to think on.
millie@beehaw.org 2 months ago
Be the change you want to see in the world. Start developing what people want and be responsive to suggestions. A handful of motivated developers can get a lot done, especially in the context of whatever niche they’re focused on.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 months ago
okidoke, fair enough