Comment on [deleted]
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoLink to an original article, not some cropped image that could easily be manipulated. Only an idiot just automatically believes an image.
Here ya go:
thetimes.com/…/israel-hamas-rape-investigation-ev…
Now, I’ll note that just because it has not been independently verified does not mean we automatically assume it never happened, that’s just believing one side’s propaganda. It means “maybe it happened, maybe it didn’t”.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s a highlighted image for people who don’t read the sources they post.
Israel just happened to lie about dozens of debunked cases, and claimed they have forensic and video evidence which did not exist. We must believe them at their word!
If “it could have happened but we have no evidence” is an argument then Donald Trump making up insane claims out immigrants eating pets also passes the fact check.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I know why the image is highlighted. I’m saying anybody who simply trusts it is an idiot, that’s all. This is the modern internet, things like that should not be trusted due to how easy editing is.
There is some evidence, it just has not been independently verified. This is different from there being “no evidence” as you claim.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
No the legal UN investigation found no evidence of rape they’re stating that pretty clearly. Not “a little”
Trump also has evidence of immigrants eating dogs. It’s just not independently verified.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Your own image does not even say no evidence, the only one saying that is you.
You are correct, Trump does have some evidence, he has supposedly seen people saying it online. Whether the evidence is any good or not requires independent verification.
We look at specific pieces of evidence, not who is saying it.