Now, I’ll note that just because it has not been independently verified does not mean we automatically assume it never happened, that’s just believing one side’s propaganda. It means “maybe it happened, maybe it didn’t”.
It’s a highlighted image for people who don’t read the sources they post.
Now, I’ll note that just because it has not been independently verified does not mean we automatically assume it never happened,
Israel just happened to lie about dozens of debunked cases, and claimed they have forensic and video evidence which did not exist. We must believe them at their word!
If “it could have happened but we have no evidence” is an argument then Donald Trump making up insane claims out immigrants eating pets also passes the fact check.
I know why the image is highlighted. I’m saying anybody who simply trusts it is an idiot, that’s all. This is the modern internet, things like that should not be trusted due to how easy editing is.
There is some evidence, it just has not been independently verified. This is different from there being “no evidence” as you claim.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Uhm.
Image
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Link to an original article, not some cropped image that could easily be manipulated. Only an idiot just automatically believes an image.
Here ya go:
thetimes.com/…/israel-hamas-rape-investigation-ev…
Now, I’ll note that just because it has not been independently verified does not mean we automatically assume it never happened, that’s just believing one side’s propaganda. It means “maybe it happened, maybe it didn’t”.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s a highlighted image for people who don’t read the sources they post.
Israel just happened to lie about dozens of debunked cases, and claimed they have forensic and video evidence which did not exist. We must believe them at their word!
If “it could have happened but we have no evidence” is an argument then Donald Trump making up insane claims out immigrants eating pets also passes the fact check.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I know why the image is highlighted. I’m saying anybody who simply trusts it is an idiot, that’s all. This is the modern internet, things like that should not be trusted due to how easy editing is.
There is some evidence, it just has not been independently verified. This is different from there being “no evidence” as you claim.