Golden rice doesnât actually exist, not in any meaningful sense
Comment on Corn đ˝
EatATaco@lemm.ee â¨3⊠â¨months⊠agoGolden rice does neither of these two things. Not that the facts matter when it comes to our irrational fear of gmos.
kralk@lemm.ee â¨3⊠â¨months⊠ago
EatATaco@lemm.ee â¨3⊠â¨months⊠ago
Itâs widespread adoption, almost certainly resulting in the unnecessary suffering of millions of people, has been hampered by anti-scienitific fanatics. So letâs not confuse that with there being something wrong with golden rice or it not existing.
But if that isnât enough, we have fast growing salmon, non browning apples, and pink pineapple which are all gmos on the market that donât have to do with pesticides or pest resistance. If we include ones that are simple resistant to viruses, then the lost grows substantially more.
Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net â¨3⊠â¨months⊠ago
what % of GMO biomass does golden rice constitute
EatATaco@lemm.ee â¨3⊠â¨months⊠ago
More than none, which is enough to disprove your claim.
newerAccountWhoDis@hexbear.net â¨3⊠â¨months⊠ago
What hello Kitty was trying to say is that most people are not objecting GMO but the way itâs used under capitalism, either to sell more pesticides (e.g. glyphosate), to make farmers dependent on seeds via patents, or both. Just because thereâs highly idealistic research doesnât mean itâs compatible with our current system.
EatATaco@lemm.ee â¨3⊠â¨months⊠ago
Then why not say that rather than the patently false claim that itâs only for pesticides? You also express some more misconceptions: seeds, regardless of how they are made are patented, are rarely reused farmers pretty much always buy new seeds. This is not an issue limited to gmos. Parents are not just for GMO plants. Again, a separate issue.
Youâre issue seems to be with capitalism, not GMO a tool used by capitalists to make more money.