This argument is based on the idea that buying ill-gotten water is equivalent to buying people
Comment on How are slavery reparations fair?
CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 year agoAt that point the people there can’t put the blame on the buyer.
If Nescle kills children and steals water, but you buy it its not you doing the bad thing, you “just” support it.
protist@mander.xyz 1 year ago
roguetrick@kbin.social 1 year ago
I can't think of a single ethical framework that considers having someone else do your dirty work as permissible. If you have zero agency, sure. If you have nearly all the agency, like the colonial powers, no.
CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I’ve never said that it was a good or acceptable thing, im just very very opposed to the idea of reparations for such things.
Clent@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Clearly. No matter the argument, you’re against reparations. That’s not because you have drawn a logical conclusion. You just believe it.
CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I have a reason. Just read the other comments, its explained there. And yes i am in general in disfavor of repetitions for most things. Money can’t buy you free from historically moral debt.
Huxleywaswrite@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“I’m not saying it’s ok, I’m just saying you should never have to take any responsibility for it”
That’s what you just said. Jackass.
CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
What “responsibility” they are all dead! Guilt is not hereditary!