Comment on Why are people downvoting the MediaBiasFactChecker not?
14th_cylon@lemm.ee 4 months agoBoth relay the same basic facts
NO, THEY DO NOT.
rex has a mange is factual statement, that can be investigated and either confirmed or rejected.
same goes for rex’s leash was inadequate and tom’s hold of the dog was weak.
there is a lot more facts in the second example, compared to first one.
it’s likely that by MBFC’s standards, both would be rated the same for that reason alone
no, they would not and it is pretty easy to find out - mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/
your powers of “paying attention, weighing, analyzing, reviewing and questioning” are not as strong as you think.
be careful not to hurt yourself when you are falling down from this mountain.
Rottcodd@lemmy.world 4 months ago
So are you saying that you wouldn’t be able to recognize my second example as a biased statement without the MBFC bot’s guidance?
Or did you just entirely miss the point?
14th_cylon@lemm.ee 4 months ago
i am saying you are lying about the same facts in your two examples and i am saying you are lying about how these two statements would be rated by mbfc, because you either didn’t exercise your imaginary analytical skills, or you are intentionally obfuscating.
you can read that. it is just above your last comment.
Image
Rottcodd@lemmy.world 4 months ago
All I see here is someone whose ego relies on a steady diet of derision hurled in the general direction of strangers on the internet.
14th_cylon@lemm.ee 4 months ago
sure. go back to your brilliant analysis that doesn’t rely on facts. bye.