Comment on Opinion: Increasing the minimum wage comes at too high a price for workers | CNN
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months agoI guess you just didn’t comprehend what you read then, it was pretty simple. Not sure why you’re so confused by it.
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 3 months ago
It stated FDR choose to support a minimum wage bill of 0.25 over a 0.40 bill. That’s probably one of those pesky facts that you don’t want to post because it doesn’t support your position.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
That single data point does not define the intent of the minimum wage itself. This is on you to prove.
Image
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 3 months ago
That single data point is one more from that article than you provided.
You show your ignorance again the article does not say that. The only time the article mentions Republican opposition they then cite what the opposition was for.
See that’s how you provide a quote that way both people know what is being referenced.
The democrats had 334 of the 435 seats in the house and 77 Senate seats in 1938 the Republicans could not block anything. Do you ever wonder why every claim you make is so easily refuted?
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
Hahaha poor Jimbo, not understanding the basics of political discourse. You’re picking apart pieces of the story to have something to argue with.
Fact is, the minimum wage was always intended to be a living wage. Despite failed attempts previous at the turn of the decade due to republican opposition, you still think FDR was lying then AND the Government has been lying about it the entire time, but you won’t assign the proper blame to the Republicans and Supreme Court who required the minimum wage to not be a full living wage.
Sorry Jimbo, you know not what you speak. Do your own research and get back to me.
Image