Comment on Is this just how it’s gonna be till Election Day?

• Cryophilia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I was basically just saying we should agree to disagree at some point.

  I’m afraid I can’t settle for that. This idea that race is some made up thing is offensive to me. I have to correct people who say they agree with it.

  You can call that race, but nobody else thinks of Senogambia when you say “the milk drinking race”,

  There it is. That’s actually what this entire discussion turns on, every time I have it. First, I have to get the other person to admit that inherited physical characteristics exist, which can be a chore for some people. Then, when they admit that, they say some variation of “but that’s not the definition of race / that’s not what people mean when they say race”.

  This is actually the more important thing that you have to shake loose of. Certain academic institutions claim this, but they are overwhelmingly wrong. When people talk about race, they do not talk about some vague abstraction. They almost always are referring to specific inherited characteristics usually tied to the physical place a person’s ancestral group is from.

  The irony is, the only people who could be operating under the delusion that when people talk about race they’re referring to some vague social thing are people who don’t interact with a lot of different people. This idea that race is a social construct is quarantined to one very specific social stratum, because anyone who gets more worldly experience very quickly realizes it’s bunk.

  It’s pretty intuitive when once you realize it. It’s very basic, very “what you see is what you get”. When people talk about race, they talk about the very surface-level, most obvious, simplest definition. No deeper meaning. People are not subconsciously philosophizing. People are not closet racial supremacists. They’re just describing what they see. “Inherited physical characteristics” is the simplest definition of race, and trying to find some deeper meaning of the term is a red herring.

  To go back to the phrenology example, the existence of race does not require bigotry. Which is probably why academia came up with this absurd idea, they were scared of bigotry. The existence of skulls does not require phrenology to be true. It’s bunk, and it’s racist.

  Racism is bullshit.

  Race exists.

  source

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Well then, I guess I break this off unilaterally at some point. Debate doesn’t work, you can’t browbeat someone into believing something. Most people just know that, I had to learn the hard way. Maybe you will eventually too.

    I personally am neither rich nor fancy. I live in the country; I’ve never lived anywhere else as an adult. Believe me, specific races are a real thing here. It’s not some thing made up by a spooky cabal of academics. It’s strange you could even think that, with all the evidence from recent history to the contrary, including laws referencing the separate races. You could argue I’m not worldly enough, but my family is rather international, which should count for something.

    source

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Debate is for the audience, not for your opponent.

      source

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I don’t think the audience cares either, past a point. The shit that gets a response is factual, and getting facts out is, along with basic respect for you, the reason I’m here.

        source

        • -> View More Comments